The 'without SEO bias' point is the most interesting part here. We're already seeing users trust LLM synthesis more than direct search precisely because it (theoretically) filters out the affiliate spam.
But aren't we just moving the problem up a layer? Brands are aggressively optimizing for LLM visibility now ('Generative Engine Optimization'). If your framework relies on LLM training data or RAG, it's still downstream of whatever content dominates the web.
Curious if you've seen any 'hallucinated brands' or persistent bias towards certain vendors in your tests across models? e.g. does Gemini favor Google products in your laptop comparison?
But aren't we just moving the problem up a layer? Brands are aggressively optimizing for LLM visibility now ('Generative Engine Optimization'). If your framework relies on LLM training data or RAG, it's still downstream of whatever content dominates the web.
Curious if you've seen any 'hallucinated brands' or persistent bias towards certain vendors in your tests across models? e.g. does Gemini favor Google products in your laptop comparison?