Comment Comment by AceJohnny2 How is that image 670 KB!? Definitely some optimization low-hanging fruit there.Edit: dang, even pngcrush can't get it below 580 KB. Disappointing performance on PNG's part. parent AceJohnny2 8 months ago
Edit: dang, even pngcrush can't get it below 580 KB. Disappointing performance on PNG's part.