I’m the author.
If anyone thinks the core claim is wrong, I’d love to know which axiom fails.
RCC doesn’t argue that current LLMs are flawed —
it argues that any embedded inference system, even a hypothetical future AGI,
inherits the same geometric limits if it cannot:
1. access its full internal state,
2. observe its containing manifold,
3. anchor to a global reference frame.
If someone can point to a real or theoretical system that violates the axioms
while still performing stable long-range inference,
that would immediately falsify RCC.
Happy to answer technical questions. The entire point is to make this falsifiable.
RCC doesn’t argue that current LLMs are flawed — it argues that any embedded inference system, even a hypothetical future AGI, inherits the same geometric limits if it cannot: 1. access its full internal state, 2. observe its containing manifold, 3. anchor to a global reference frame.
If someone can point to a real or theoretical system that violates the axioms while still performing stable long-range inference, that would immediately falsify RCC.
Happy to answer technical questions. The entire point is to make this falsifiable.