> It simply describes the recognition of material as "AI-generated".
That works as a good definition for me. Whether or not you want to call it "slop", anything that helps to filter out AI-generated stuff could be helpful.
My only concern about this is that it seems to rely on user reporting, and if that reporting includes (mistakenly or otherwise) sites that don't have AI generated content, that could make the tool less useful.
That works as a good definition for me. Whether or not you want to call it "slop", anything that helps to filter out AI-generated stuff could be helpful.
My only concern about this is that it seems to rely on user reporting, and if that reporting includes (mistakenly or otherwise) sites that don't have AI generated content, that could make the tool less useful.