Comment Comment by pizlonator It's acceptable to state, without evidence, that functional programming and static typing make things more reliable.But this isn't a falsifiable claim. We cannot possibly know if this is true or not.- Not all of banking and telecom use functional programming or even static typing.- Functional programming often leads to write-only incomprehensible code; the exact opposite of what you need to have a reliable system.- There's no hard evidence that static typing improves reliability. Only vibes and feels. parent pizlonator 10 months ago
But this isn't a falsifiable claim. We cannot possibly know if this is true or not.
- Not all of banking and telecom use functional programming or even static typing.
- Functional programming often leads to write-only incomprehensible code; the exact opposite of what you need to have a reliable system.
- There's no hard evidence that static typing improves reliability. Only vibes and feels.