> imports, ingest, dataimport, ímport, impørt.
a few good principles (not rules) for naming libraries:
a) signal abstraction level
b) avoid being too literal for it constrains evolution
c) pronounceable and spellable
d) prefer nouns over verbs because libraries are things not actions
e) metaphors beat descriptions
Consequently, I would avoid imports, ímport, impørt
"Ingest" feels like it is in a good direction. Any good reason not to use it?
a few good principles (not rules) for naming libraries:
a) signal abstraction level
b) avoid being too literal for it constrains evolution
c) pronounceable and spellable
d) prefer nouns over verbs because libraries are things not actions
e) metaphors beat descriptions
Consequently, I would avoid imports, ímport, impørt
"Ingest" feels like it is in a good direction. Any good reason not to use it?