Comment Comment by wongarsu "ridiculous precision" being 1km resolution. Considering how one of the author's said "The U.S. taxpayers have a right to this data" I really wish they had put up a web viewerHere's the paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-06391-wAnd the data as a bunch of zipped geotiffs: https://zenodo.org/records/15446748A reasonable-ish resolution version of the headline image (total CO2 emissions 2010-2022): https://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/...And my favorite: Difference in CO2 emissions between 2010 and 2022: https://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/... parent wongarsu 10 months ago
Here's the paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-06391-w
And the data as a bunch of zipped geotiffs: https://zenodo.org/records/15446748
A reasonable-ish resolution version of the headline image (total CO2 emissions 2010-2022): https://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/...
And my favorite: Difference in CO2 emissions between 2010 and 2022: https://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/...