> The article consistently refers to DHRUV64 as a "microprocessor".
This is technically incorrect.
It is a microprocessor, not a microprocessor.
The distinction matters; a microprocessor is the entire chip, while a microprocessor is a specific component.
Basic terminology should be accurate.
> The article consistently refers to DHRUV64 as a "microprocessor". This is technically incorrect. It is a microprocessor, not a microprocessor. The distinction matters; a microprocessor is the entire chip, while a microprocessor is a specific component. Basic terminology should be accurate.