Groklaw has quite a lot of detail about the jury foreman and his bankruptcy.
It's really rather unsavoury, drawing all sorts of implications and making a number of unpleasant semi-accusations.
That's disappointing. A stupid patent case is stupid and there is plenty to discuss there, without dragging someone through the mud for something they did in their past.
It's really rather unsavoury, drawing all sorts of implications and making a number of unpleasant semi-accusations.
That's disappointing. A stupid patent case is stupid and there is plenty to discuss there, without dragging someone through the mud for something they did in their past.