Wouldn't it be more along the lines of "source available" being a public park that you're free to access but can't monetize by e.g. selling tickets to - while "open source" would let you do whatever you want with the park.
Ironically I think the analogy explains why many people find "source available" to align with their moral compass more than "open source" necessarily does.
Ironically I think the analogy explains why many people find "source available" to align with their moral compass more than "open source" necessarily does.