The interviews with the foreman following the case were pretty damning—it sounded like he barely listened to the judge's instructions and essentially goaded the jury into returning a verdict which expressed his personal feelings about patents more than it reflected anything about Apple vs. Samsung.
I suppose the question, though, is whether he actually did anything that's provably "misconduct"...
I suppose the question, though, is whether he actually did anything that's provably "misconduct"...