> Forming deterministic actions is a sign of computation, not intelligence.
What computations can process and formalize other computations as transferable entity/medium, meaning to teach other computations via various mediums?
> Intelligence is probably (I guess) dependent on the nondeterministic actions.
I do agree, but I think intelligent actions should be deterministic, even if expressing non-deterministic behavior.
> Computation is when you query a standby, doing nothing, machine and it computes a deterministic answer.
There are whole languages for stochastic programming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_programming to express deterministically non-deterministic behavior, so I think that is not true.
> Intelligence (or at least some sign of it) is when machine queries you, the operator, on it's own volition.
So you think the thing, who holds more control/force at doing arbitrary things as the thing sees fit, is more intelligent? That sounds to me more like the definition of power, not intelligence.
What computations can process and formalize other computations as transferable entity/medium, meaning to teach other computations via various mediums?
> Intelligence is probably (I guess) dependent on the nondeterministic actions.
I do agree, but I think intelligent actions should be deterministic, even if expressing non-deterministic behavior.
> Computation is when you query a standby, doing nothing, machine and it computes a deterministic answer.
There are whole languages for stochastic programming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_programming to express deterministically non-deterministic behavior, so I think that is not true.
> Intelligence (or at least some sign of it) is when machine queries you, the operator, on it's own volition.
So you think the thing, who holds more control/force at doing arbitrary things as the thing sees fit, is more intelligent? That sounds to me more like the definition of power, not intelligence.