Hey, I watched your video a few times and really like the idea. Is the inferencing being done on the CPU, do you support GPU as well?
The idea is solid and I like the direction you’re going with it, but the demo doesn’t really show it off. There’s a lot of jumping around in the UI and it’s hard to follow what’s happening without any audio. The interesting bit is right at the end when the rule gets generated, but it’s over so fast that you don’t really get a feel for what Syd is actually doing under the hood.
It was a bit hard to follow with no audio, just a simple “here’s the scan running, here’s the parser kicking in, here’s where the model steps in” kind of thing. Even speeding up the slower parts would make it easier to see the flow. Right now it feels more like a screen recording than a walkthrough. When you’ve spent hundreds of hours inside something it all feels obvious, but for someone seeing it for 3 minutes it’s tough to piece together what’s happening. Been there myself.
The automation angle you mentioned in the post is the part that really sells it. If the tool can take a directory, scan it, parse, correlate and then spit out the rule with almost no manual copying, that’s the kind of workflow improvement I (and maybe others?) care about. The video doesn’t quite show that yet, so it’s hard to judge how smooth the actual experience is.
I’m not against backing something like this, especially as it runs locally and handles the annoying parts. £250 is fine, but at the moment the payment page is just a Stripe form with no real signal that the thing is ready or actively maintained. A clearer demo, a roadmap, or even a short narrated “here’s the state of it today” would go a long way in building confidence.
Apologies if this comes across a bit direct. The idea is solid though. Local LLM + structured output from real security tools is genuinely useful. Keep going.
The idea is solid and I like the direction you’re going with it, but the demo doesn’t really show it off. There’s a lot of jumping around in the UI and it’s hard to follow what’s happening without any audio. The interesting bit is right at the end when the rule gets generated, but it’s over so fast that you don’t really get a feel for what Syd is actually doing under the hood.
It was a bit hard to follow with no audio, just a simple “here’s the scan running, here’s the parser kicking in, here’s where the model steps in” kind of thing. Even speeding up the slower parts would make it easier to see the flow. Right now it feels more like a screen recording than a walkthrough. When you’ve spent hundreds of hours inside something it all feels obvious, but for someone seeing it for 3 minutes it’s tough to piece together what’s happening. Been there myself.
The automation angle you mentioned in the post is the part that really sells it. If the tool can take a directory, scan it, parse, correlate and then spit out the rule with almost no manual copying, that’s the kind of workflow improvement I (and maybe others?) care about. The video doesn’t quite show that yet, so it’s hard to judge how smooth the actual experience is.
I’m not against backing something like this, especially as it runs locally and handles the annoying parts. £250 is fine, but at the moment the payment page is just a Stripe form with no real signal that the thing is ready or actively maintained. A clearer demo, a roadmap, or even a short narrated “here’s the state of it today” would go a long way in building confidence.
Apologies if this comes across a bit direct. The idea is solid though. Local LLM + structured output from real security tools is genuinely useful. Keep going.