Comment

Comment by kure256

A small additional note for context:

I’m not arguing that “LLMs will replace browsing” in some absolute way — but it is observable that for many users, the entry point for information is shifting from search → assistant. When you actually inspect how models consume real websites today, the results are pretty uneven:

pages with clean HTML and predictable structure get parsed reliably

JSON-LD is used surprisingly often (but only if it’s correct and minimal)

heavy client-side rendering breaks extraction more than people expect

semantic markup still beats any “AI-enabled” tool by a mile

models hallucinate less when the source has clear hierarchy and meaning

This project isn’t trying to reinvent SEO — it’s more like exploring the minimum structural guarantees that make an LLM treat a page as a trustworthy, cite-able source instead of ignoring it or misreading it.

If anyone here has done experiments with:

how GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, etc. read arbitrary web pages

failure cases in parsing / hallucination caused by layout

the effect of metadata vs full-text signal

or even prompt strategies for web ingestion

…I’d genuinely love to compare notes.

parent kure256 11 months ago

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton