If humans "generate plausible looking data" despite any processes to ensure data quality they've likely engaged in willful fraud.
An LLM doing so needn't even be willful from the author's part. We're going to see issues with forecasts/slide decks full of inaccuracies that are hard to review.
An LLM doing so needn't even be willful from the author's part. We're going to see issues with forecasts/slide decks full of inaccuracies that are hard to review.