Doesn't bug #4 eliminate supposed bugs #2 and #3? The intent for the author of the code would have produced bugs #2 & #3, however since that isn't the case, there are only really 3 bugs.
Either way, this rant doesn't really offer any insight on the programs context, and what the author should have done. Nothing to learn here folks.
PS - Can we stop using "epic fail" and other internet-fanboy like colloquialisms in our titles please?
Either way, this rant doesn't really offer any insight on the programs context, and what the author should have done. Nothing to learn here folks.
PS - Can we stop using "epic fail" and other internet-fanboy like colloquialisms in our titles please?