> Participating organizations raised concerns about responses that relied
heavily or solely on Wikipedia content – Radio-Canada calculated
that of 108 sources cited in responses from ChatGPT, 58% were from
Wikipedia. CBC-Radio-Canada are amongst a number of Canadian
media organisations suing ChatGPT’s creator, OpenAI, for copyright
infringement. Although the impact of this on ChatGPT’s approach
to sourcing is not explicitly known, it may explain the high use of
Wikipedia sources.
Also, is attributing, without any citation, ChatGPT's preference for Wikipedia to a reprisal to an active lawsuit a significant issue? Or do the authors get off scot-free because they caged it in "we don't know, but maybe it's the case"?
Also, is attributing, without any citation, ChatGPT's preference for Wikipedia to a reprisal to an active lawsuit a significant issue? Or do the authors get off scot-free because they caged it in "we don't know, but maybe it's the case"?