I guess I don’t find that argument very compelling. If you’re convinced the code branch can’t ever be taken, you also should be confident that it doesn’t need to be tested.
This feels like chasing arbitrary 100% test coverage at the expense of safety. The code quality isn’t actually improved by omitting the checks even though it makes testing coverage go up.
This feels like chasing arbitrary 100% test coverage at the expense of safety. The code quality isn’t actually improved by omitting the checks even though it makes testing coverage go up.