Comment

Comment by varun_chopra

Marketing is being done really well in 2025, with brands injecting themselves into conversations on Reddit, LinkedIn, and every other public forum. [1]

CEOs, AI "thought leaders," and VCs are advertising LLMs as magic, and tools like v0 and Lovable as the next big thing. Every response from leaders is some variation of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w61d-NBqafM

On the ground, we know that creating CLAUDE.md or cursorrules basically does nothing. It’s up to the LLM to follow instructions, and it does so based on RNG as far as I can tell. I have very simple, basic rules set up that are never followed. This leads me to believe everyone posting on that thread on Cursor is an amateur.

Beyond this, if you’re working on novel code, LLMs are absolutely horrible at doing anything. A lot of assumptions are made, non-existent libraries are used, and agents are just great at using tokens to generate no tangible result whatsoever.

I’m at a stage where I use LLMs the same way I would use speech-to-text (code) - telling the LLM exactly what I want, what files it should consider, and it adds _some_ value by thinking of edge cases I might’ve missed, best practices I’m unaware of, and writing better grammar than I do.

Edit:

[1] To add to this, any time you use search or Perplexity or what have you, the results come from all this marketing garbage being pumped into the internet by marketing teams.

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton