Nothing in this article is new, and the problem with RTK has always been the (unpaid) availability of reference stations. Good on them for trying to make a package of it, but maybe this "news" site could've used a bit less unchecked enthusiasm.
Also, RTK is the opposite of "regular" GPS, it's generally considered a "special" usage mode of GPS.
And discussing urban canyons with no mention of QZSS?
Also, RTK is the opposite of "regular" GPS, it's generally considered a "special" usage mode of GPS.
And discussing urban canyons with no mention of QZSS?