I think it points to a failure of the scientific community to identify better criteria.
There is plenty of data showing diet has a big impact on health and other outcomes, yet far less data on specifics.
Since science doesn't give specific things to ban, legislation is pretty much headed towards "let's have everyone eat what they eat in the south of France where people are really healthy".
There is plenty of data showing diet has a big impact on health and other outcomes, yet far less data on specifics.
Since science doesn't give specific things to ban, legislation is pretty much headed towards "let's have everyone eat what they eat in the south of France where people are really healthy".