Comment

Comment by reissbaker

I think what's happening here is:

1. The Army gave a reasonable analysis of the security issues with the prototype.

2. This is normal.

3. But most people don't have experience in this field.

4. A reporter got access to the report, and published the most salacious-sounding parts — and if you don't know that this is normal, it sounds really bad.

5. Oh no, the sky is falling. Click here to watch our ads, oops I mean, to read all about it.

Generally my read on tech-adjacent reporters is they have very little understanding of what they're reporting on, and mostly try to manufacture outrage to get clicks.

parent reissbaker 1 year ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton