I'm curious. Did either of you ever notice the implicit philosophical assumptions that you have to make to come to the conclusion that one infinity can be larger than another?
Despite the fact that this was actively debated for decades, modern math courses seldom acknowledge the fact that they are making unprovable intellectual leaps along the way.
Despite the fact that this was actively debated for decades, modern math courses seldom acknowledge the fact that they are making unprovable intellectual leaps along the way.