> RPC is often accused of committing many of the fallacies of distributed computing.
> But this reputation is outdated. When RPC was first invented some 40 years ago, async programming barely existed. We did not have Promises, much less async and await.
I'm confused. How is this a "protocol" if its core premises rely on very specific implementation of concurrency in a very specific language?
I'm confused. How is this a "protocol" if its core premises rely on very specific implementation of concurrency in a very specific language?