Comment

Comment by pizlonator

I don't support vfork(2) right now, only fork(2).

I have some super crazy ideas about how to make vfork(2) work, but I don't particularly like any of them. I'll implement it if I find some situation where vfork(2) is strongly required (so far I haven't found even one such case). The closest is that I've found cases where I have to add the CLOEXEC pipe trick to do error handling the fork(2) way rather than the vfork(2) way.

parent pizlonator 1 year ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton