Sounds like Carlson knows (or claims to) a great deal about the crime scene. Some of that contradicting the police report.
How low does an interviewer need to go on something like this, before the interviewee's best countermove is to say "If that's actually true, then it sounds like he was murdered. By you"?
How low does an interviewer need to go on something like this, before the interviewee's best countermove is to say "If that's actually true, then it sounds like he was murdered. By you"?