Comment Comment by pansa2 > it’s a shame no language is as beautiful as Ruby [...] I really think it's a bad choice of Ruby not to care for typesDo you think Ruby could change something so fundamental as dynamic => static typing and still retain its beauty?The only static typing solution I've seen for Ruby is Sorbet, and it's... not beautiful. parent pansa2 1 year ago
Do you think Ruby could change something so fundamental as dynamic => static typing and still retain its beauty?
The only static typing solution I've seen for Ruby is Sorbet, and it's... not beautiful.