How is this any different from outsourcing attestation to a third-party?
Considering most regulations require the party reliant on validating the data to store the source or proof, it seems like the only plausible mass-deployment of this approach would be US state-based ID systems specifically for drinking/anonymous patrons. That excludes driving, gambling, restricted entertainment, medicine etc.
Countries wouldn’t adopt it nationally or federally, they’d copy it.
Maybe online games or communities that want to keep age of users above a set amount? I don’t see them paying for this though.
Considering most regulations require the party reliant on validating the data to store the source or proof, it seems like the only plausible mass-deployment of this approach would be US state-based ID systems specifically for drinking/anonymous patrons. That excludes driving, gambling, restricted entertainment, medicine etc.
Countries wouldn’t adopt it nationally or federally, they’d copy it.
Maybe online games or communities that want to keep age of users above a set amount? I don’t see them paying for this though.
Am I missing something?