Let's leave the analogy in it's grave. The point is that the responsibility for delivery falls to the provider of the internet service not the proprietor of the content in another country, who is not a business in the country and not subject to it's laws, the isp can ban connectivity to whoever they want to protect themselves from criminal liability. It's like saying the uk can criminally punish anyone for any content on the internet in any country because their citizens accesed it. It's ridiculous.
Agree with the point that it's mostly to extort larger firms who do in fact operate businesses there.
Agree with the point that it's mostly to extort larger firms who do in fact operate businesses there.