You're right; I meant to refute the following point:
NASA nixed the idea of propulsive landing for Dragon 2 for this reason (safety)
It wasn't because of safety, but because it would have needed tests, development and certification (for a new type of landing) while already having an established method (splashing into the sea).
It wasn't because of safety, but because it would have needed tests, development and certification (for a new type of landing) while already having an established method (splashing into the sea).