This doesn’t provide any good arguments for why Roy Fielding’s conception should be taken as the gospel of how things should be done. At best, it points out that what we call REST now isn’t what Roy Fielding wanted.
Furthermore, it doesn’t explain how Roy Fielding’s conception would make sense for non-interactive clients. The fact that it doesn’t make sense is a large part of why virtually nobody is following it.
Furthermore, it doesn’t explain how Roy Fielding’s conception would make sense for non-interactive clients. The fact that it doesn’t make sense is a large part of why virtually nobody is following it.