Comment

Comment by jiveturkey

Not understanding forgery. What is being forged? You have the key material.

> I wanted cryptographic proof the signature is correct before trying to forge my own.

But you aren't forging anything? You are producing a signature from your own key material? I could be missing something important, certainly. But wouldn't this be earth shattering if you can forge a p256 signature? Apologies if I'm just not getting it.

> Today we will: ... Explore [...] cloning credentials.

Perhaps I didn't read it well enough yet, but I don't see any cloning going on here.

Lastly, a lot of work was done reverse engineering that could also have happened just from reading docs. I suppose from the POV of implementing a software passkey, it's useful to have written the tracing tools for help validating your own implementation. But it's presented as if you were uncovering a secret part of the protocol.

> Do Big Sites Care?

A more important question is: should they? Left as an exercise.

> reverse-engineering CTAP2 at the byte level,

Is it reverse-engineering? Feels more like decoding. Forgive me again if I didn't understand.

parent jiveturkey 1 year ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton