I've tended to agree with this line of argument, but on the other hand...
I expect that anybody you asked 10 years ago who was at least decently knowledgeable about tech and AI would have agreed that the Turing Test is a pretty decent way to determine if we have a "real" AI, that's actually "thinking" and is on the road to AGI etc.
Well, the current generation of LLMs blow away that Turing Test. So, what now? Were we all full of it before? Is there a new test to determine if something is "really" AI?
I expect that anybody you asked 10 years ago who was at least decently knowledgeable about tech and AI would have agreed that the Turing Test is a pretty decent way to determine if we have a "real" AI, that's actually "thinking" and is on the road to AGI etc.
Well, the current generation of LLMs blow away that Turing Test. So, what now? Were we all full of it before? Is there a new test to determine if something is "really" AI?