> I really don't like how this article claims that the primary issue with Go's error handling is that the syntax is too verbose.
I don't believe this claim is made anywhere.
We've decided that we are not going to make any further attempts to change the syntax of error handling in the foreseeable future. That frees up attention to consider other issues (with errors or otherwise).
I don't believe this claim is made anywhere.
We've decided that we are not going to make any further attempts to change the syntax of error handling in the foreseeable future. That frees up attention to consider other issues (with errors or otherwise).