With all due respect Mr. Geohot, you've got an awful lotta nerve to throw stones from your glass house. This guy needs to drop the middle school tough-guy tone and post numbers. The central thesis of this article is sound, lead with it:
> You aren't going to get better deals on tapeouts/IP than NVIDIA/AMD. You need some advantage.
> If you want a dataflow graph compiler, build a dataflow graph compiler.
Now explain why. Clearly Tenstorrent is happy to build Yet Another Abstraction Layer, so instead of bullying them over it you should at least attempt to actively humiliate them for the approach. You know, produce some manner of evidence that vindicates your position instead of relying on your authority alone. Jim Keller has no reason to take this seriously, even if you're right.
Without any numbers this feels like one cult of personality trying to bait another into a shit-flinging contest as a marketing scheme. We've seen this happen several times before on Hacker News, and it doesn't end up with either side making an Nvidia-killer. This is not a model for productive discourse.
> You aren't going to get better deals on tapeouts/IP than NVIDIA/AMD. You need some advantage.
> If you want a dataflow graph compiler, build a dataflow graph compiler.
Now explain why. Clearly Tenstorrent is happy to build Yet Another Abstraction Layer, so instead of bullying them over it you should at least attempt to actively humiliate them for the approach. You know, produce some manner of evidence that vindicates your position instead of relying on your authority alone. Jim Keller has no reason to take this seriously, even if you're right.
Without any numbers this feels like one cult of personality trying to bait another into a shit-flinging contest as a marketing scheme. We've seen this happen several times before on Hacker News, and it doesn't end up with either side making an Nvidia-killer. This is not a model for productive discourse.