Comment Comment by linguistbreaker I hadn't heard of this and it's fun to think about.It's 100,000 s/day as opposed to our current 86,400 s/day which is not far off.Hours, however, were twice as long.They had time pieces that displayed both together. parent linguistbreaker 1 year ago
It's 100,000 s/day as opposed to our current 86,400 s/day which is not far off.
Hours, however, were twice as long.
They had time pieces that displayed both together.