> If you believe burning carbon fuels is a big negative externality, then solar users are subsidizing everyone else.
If the energy company is paying you $0.12 to sell electricity for $0.09 - they're losing money. Not to mention, they aren't covering any of the costs of maintaining their network (which is a large chunk of the overall cost).
If they're forced to buy rooftop solar from homeowners at a loss - they are FORCED to transfer that loss onto other costumers - which means the other customers are subsidizing that.
There isn't anything tricky about who is subsidizing whom.
Your issues with "dirty" energy are entirely separate.
If the energy company is paying you $0.12 to sell electricity for $0.09 - they're losing money. Not to mention, they aren't covering any of the costs of maintaining their network (which is a large chunk of the overall cost).
If they're forced to buy rooftop solar from homeowners at a loss - they are FORCED to transfer that loss onto other costumers - which means the other customers are subsidizing that.
There isn't anything tricky about who is subsidizing whom.
Your issues with "dirty" energy are entirely separate.