Comment Comment by scuol It still seems to have the problems most other LLMs suffer with except Gemini: it loses context so quickly.I asked it about a paper I was looking at (SLOG [0]) and it basically lost the context of what "slog" referred to after 3 prompts.1. I asked for an example transaction illustrating the key advantages of the SLOG approach. It responded with some general DB transaction stuff.2. I then said "no use slog like we were talking about" and then it gave me a golang example using the log/slog packageEven without the weird political things around Grok, it just isn't that good.[0] https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p1747-ren.pdf parent scuol 1 year ago
I asked it about a paper I was looking at (SLOG [0]) and it basically lost the context of what "slog" referred to after 3 prompts.
1. I asked for an example transaction illustrating the key advantages of the SLOG approach. It responded with some general DB transaction stuff.
2. I then said "no use slog like we were talking about" and then it gave me a golang example using the log/slog package
Even without the weird political things around Grok, it just isn't that good.
[0] https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p1747-ren.pdf