> when the conclusions of scientific papers (in these softer science fields), contradict common sense, they tend to be unreproducible; the ones which don't, are.
Citation needed?
I don't know what would lead to that conclusion. And it would seem to run counter to the entire history of the field of psychology, for example.
Citation needed?
I don't know what would lead to that conclusion. And it would seem to run counter to the entire history of the field of psychology, for example.