I code with multiple LLMs every day and build products that use LLM tech under the hood.
I dont think we're anywhere near LLMs being good at code design.
Existing models make _tons_ of basic mistakes and require supervision even for relatively simple coding tasks in popular languages, and its worse for languages and frameworks that are less represented in public sources of training data.
I am _frequently_ having to tell Claude/ChatGPT to clean up basic architectural and design defects.
Theres no way I would trust this unsupervised.
Can you point to _any_ evidence to support that human software development abilities will be eclipsed by LLMs other than trying to predict which part of the S-curve we're on?
Can you point to _any_ evidence to support that human software development abilities will be eclipsed by LLMs other than trying to predict which part of the S-curve we're on?