> without the cognitive bias that many of us will carry.
It is naive and incorrect to believe LLMs do not have biases. Of course they do, they are all trained on biased content. There are plenty of articles on the subject.
> Would you jump into the ocean and start trying to talk with them, or would you look up what is already discovered?
Why resort to straw men arguments? Of course anyone would start by looking up what has already been discovered, that doesn’t immediately mean reaching for and blindly trusting any random LLM. The first thing you should do, in fact, is figure out which prior research is important and reliable. There are too many studies out there which are obviously subpar or outright lies.
It is naive and incorrect to believe LLMs do not have biases. Of course they do, they are all trained on biased content. There are plenty of articles on the subject.
> Would you jump into the ocean and start trying to talk with them, or would you look up what is already discovered?
Why resort to straw men arguments? Of course anyone would start by looking up what has already been discovered, that doesn’t immediately mean reaching for and blindly trusting any random LLM. The first thing you should do, in fact, is figure out which prior research is important and reliable. There are too many studies out there which are obviously subpar or outright lies.