I don't accept this at face value. I'm open to this line of reasoning, but can you prove it or provide evidence that there's something to it?
I also think there is a counter point that now fast food laborers have more money to spend on fast food or other businesses that provide goods or services that help grow the economy.
The more I think about it, the more it sounds like you are defending trickle down economics, which is literally a turd of a theory... It's other name is Horse and Sparrow economics. If the horse eats enough oats, then sparrows can survive of its droppings.
I also think there is a counter point that now fast food laborers have more money to spend on fast food or other businesses that provide goods or services that help grow the economy.
The more I think about it, the more it sounds like you are defending trickle down economics, which is literally a turd of a theory... It's other name is Horse and Sparrow economics. If the horse eats enough oats, then sparrows can survive of its droppings.