OK, I have to ask: isn't this agents to agents idea kind of Science Fiction?
I absolutely get the value of LLMs calling tools and APIs. I still don't see much value in LLMs calling other LLMs.
Everyone gets really excited about it - "langchain" named their whole company over the idea of chaining LLMs together - but aside from a few niche applications (Deep Research style tools presumably fire off a bunch of sub-prompts to summarize content they are crawling, Claude Code uses multiple prompts executions to edit files) is it really THAT useful? Worth building an entire new protocol with a flashy name and a bunch of marketing launch partners?
LLMs are unreliable enough already without compounding their unreliability by chaining them together!
I absolutely get the value of LLMs calling tools and APIs. I still don't see much value in LLMs calling other LLMs.
Everyone gets really excited about it - "langchain" named their whole company over the idea of chaining LLMs together - but aside from a few niche applications (Deep Research style tools presumably fire off a bunch of sub-prompts to summarize content they are crawling, Claude Code uses multiple prompts executions to edit files) is it really THAT useful? Worth building an entire new protocol with a flashy name and a bunch of marketing launch partners?
LLMs are unreliable enough already without compounding their unreliability by chaining them together!