> Code should be easy to read. It should be clear. No hiding code under clever constructs, fancy macros or overloading.
I highly agree with this. I do not always want highly abstracted code, and some programming languages aiming to replace C are much more difficult to read, that said, Rust is supposed to replace C++, not C, right?
I highly agree with this. I do not always want highly abstracted code, and some programming languages aiming to replace C are much more difficult to read, that said, Rust is supposed to replace C++, not C, right?
Thank you for the article!