Comment Comment by shw1n this is actually in the footnotes and addressed by the "thinking in bets" section"[9] Fully understanding I can be the one in the wrong -- however, when this is the case, the person explaining is usually able to:understand my argument convey their disagreement in good faith without circular reasoning or rhetorical tricks""There's a 40% chance this succeeds because of A, 25% chance of B, 10% of X, and 5% something we haven't thought of" parent shw1n 1 year ago
"[9] Fully understanding I can be the one in the wrong -- however, when this is the case, the person explaining is usually able to:
understand my argument convey their disagreement in good faith without circular reasoning or rhetorical tricks"
"There's a 40% chance this succeeds because of A, 25% chance of B, 10% of X, and 5% something we haven't thought of"