I have yet to see a single thing that AI is better than humans at. Faster, yes. Better than average, yes. Highly useful in areas that are not your expertise, yes. AI does have its valuable use cases.
But better than all humans? Not one thing. And I'm not sure they can be - no matter how much context we add, they are still churning up and regurgitating human-created data. They cannot innovate.
The only way I could rationalize such a claim would be to define "better" as "good enough and a lot faster".
But better than all humans? Not one thing. And I'm not sure they can be - no matter how much context we add, they are still churning up and regurgitating human-created data. They cannot innovate.
The only way I could rationalize such a claim would be to define "better" as "good enough and a lot faster".