This is an equally unsupportable claim, though. This requires enumeration of the entire state of the universe, an impossibility. This is just the standard swan problem (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_swan_theory). What you have is a model you're very confident in without the deductively-rational basis your diction implies.
People should really read more hume if they're going to weigh in on philosophy of science.
People should really read more hume if they're going to weigh in on philosophy of science.