> Also, it would be silly to bottleneck your protocol implementation benchmark on encryption that would be shared amongst implementations because that does not highlight your overhead advantages
It would be great if benchmarks with no encryption were a thing.
There's massive overheads, and I explicitly avoided saying whether it's "fast" or not because to a lot of people serving 1000req/s seems "fast" and TLS is basically the main algorithmic complexity you'd expect from a data transfer protocol.
It would be great if benchmarks with no encryption were a thing.
There's massive overheads, and I explicitly avoided saying whether it's "fast" or not because to a lot of people serving 1000req/s seems "fast" and TLS is basically the main algorithmic complexity you'd expect from a data transfer protocol.