ICMJE guidelines are frequently cited by other publishers, with the caveat that it depends based on the field. (Which makes sense. A "substantial contribution" to the LIGO collaboration might be much less direct than one in ML or field geology.)
> Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
> Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; AND
> Final approval of the version to be published; AND
> Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
So you are right. The corresponding author who got funding for the postdoc who designed the experiment for the graduate student that supervised undergradutes and wrote the paper would have a pretty tenuous commection to authorship.
But good luck to everyone else in that chain publishing without them.
Ref: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-respo...
> Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; AND
> Drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content; AND
> Final approval of the version to be published; AND
> Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
So you are right. The corresponding author who got funding for the postdoc who designed the experiment for the graduate student that supervised undergradutes and wrote the paper would have a pretty tenuous commection to authorship.
But good luck to everyone else in that chain publishing without them.
Ref: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-respo...