>Does anyone else find this article's writing style to have some hints of AI?
"I think this is AI" is the least interesting, lowest-signal comment one can make here on HN, beating out perennial contenders "I hate this scroll bar", "this site hijacks my back button", and "why does this site require JavaScript?"
If you can actually make an AI detector that works, do that and print money for yourself. Otherwise accept that all "AI detectors" have massive false positive rates, your intuition included.
If visitors like what they see on the page, they will up vote it. If they don't, they won't. That's how HN works.
"I think this is AI" is the least interesting, lowest-signal comment one can make here on HN, beating out perennial contenders "I hate this scroll bar", "this site hijacks my back button", and "why does this site require JavaScript?"
If you can actually make an AI detector that works, do that and print money for yourself. Otherwise accept that all "AI detectors" have massive false positive rates, your intuition included.
If visitors like what they see on the page, they will up vote it. If they don't, they won't. That's how HN works.